top of page

Fat Tails (Macro SWOT Update)

  • 1 day ago
  • 3 min read

Here is a new edition of the SWOT framework first introduced in November 2022. The last analysis published in mid-2025 observed that any expectation of a return to normalcy had vanished. Today, that verdict holds. As captured by Mohamed El-Erian from the Wharton School, ‘the normal bell distribution has been replaced by one with unusually fat tails.

 

The Iran crisis does not feature prominently in the SWOT. This is not a reflection of indifference to the human cost of war. Rather, financial markets have historically treated regional conflicts as economically contained events unless they spill over into systemic variables such as global energy prices, as explained in ‘Markets Have No Mercy’ (2015). While I acknowledge the tone of recent headlines, I do not assign a high probability to a scenario in which the conflict lasts long enough to produce a material global economic shock.


Strengths (in approx. order of importance from high to low)

Weaknesses (in approx. order of importance from high to low)

Opportunities (in approx. order of importance from high to low)

Threats (in approx. order of importance from high to low)

Short-term (2026/2027)

Short-term (2026/2027)

Longer term (2028+)

Longer term (2028+)

 

 

In 2022, the macro picture was presented as ‘reasonably balanced.’ The dominant macro drivers were easily identifiable and largely cyclical: energy prices would normalize, inflation would peak and abate, and China would reopen post COVID. And they all did.

 

The 2026 matrix shows that significant sources of uncertainty have shifted from the cyclical to the structural: institutional stress in democracies, AI transition, and geopolitical fragmentation.

 

The upside scenarios are as plausible as the downside ones. Fat tails cut both ways. The mean has not moved. It has simply become much less relevant.

 
 
 

Comments


Subscribe Form

©2019 by Le Banquier Déchaîné

bottom of page