top of page

Think Big

The COVID liberation is around the corner. After months of seeing much of the joy in life – when not life itself – suppressed, an irrepressible feeling of euphoria is set to be unleashed on large portions of the world population by the end of the second quarter. This is being savagely underestimated as protracted vaccination rollout plans, healthcare systems on the brink and rising mobility restrictions are currently sapping the morale of the population.

History will mark the turning point. It will be accompanied by the prospect of two years of strong cyclical recovery fueled by massive pent-up consumer and corporate demand driving global GDP growth to 5% or more per annum. The cyclical tailwind will be extraordinary, sending the stock markets and M&A activity to further heights in a low volatility environment.

Many will get carried away and lose sight of the broader perspective which remains rather sobering. Indeed, once the output gap is closed by 2023, the global economy will return to its ex-growth status as structural weaknesses resurface. Worse, questions about sustainability will plague vast sections of the industrial world. The markets will only find support in financial immortality.

Fortunately, a wind of change can help improve these dynamics. The persistent reference to 2050 in the context of net zero emission objectives seems to be slowly opening a totally new time horizon for a growing number of firms and their stakeholders. Remarkably, 2030 is subtly becoming an acceptable milestone for corporate strategy. Such a change in timeframe would offer an opportunity for industrial technology firms to nurture greater long-term ambition at a higher risk when it comes to innovation as they attempt to boost their growth profile.

But large industrial companies cannot transform themselves into start-ups. Whilst a potential source of inspiration, successful ‘lean start-up’ principles require a degree of speed and agility which eludes mature organizations. More promisingly, large corporates can leverage their industrial know-how, deep domain expertise and access to financing to act as corporate venture capitalists. In fact, corporates participated at a record level in venture capital (VC) fundraising in 2020. I expect that positive trend to continue, with many companies further developing their activities in this domain as they seek to build a long-term competitive advantage in new technologies.

Simply mastering VC skills is not sufficient, though. Indeed, the VC industry has struggled to generate appropriate returns, delivering a similar performance as the broad stock market since the tech bubble burst in 2000 despite incurring greater risk. The objective must be to be amongst the absolute best in the field. In his book Zero to One: Notes on Start-ups, Or How To Build The Future’ (2014), Peter Thiel, a co-founder of PayPal, shares his perspective on the secrets to successful venture capital. One principle stands out: the ‘Power Law’. It states that ‘the best investment in a successful fund equals or outperforms the entire rest of the fund combined [by potentially generating a 10x return]’. With this objective in mind, corporates ought to look for VC investment opportunities targeting an XXL addressable markets, say $100 billion or more by 2030.

As the industrial tech world finds itself at an inflection point, the macro- and microeconomic circumstances could not call for a clearer strategic intent: Now is the time to think big.

Further readings:

332 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

The Great Dislocation

A year ago, 2020 was named ‘The Advent of Virtuality’ (retrospective below). What was 2021 about? Considering the imbalances created by COVID-19 and their mismanagement, I propose to call 2021 ‘The Gr

Pragmatic Intellectualism

This week’s first trip to the U.S. in more than eighteen months was magical, and I dare say, emotional. I feel a strong attachment to the American nation from my student years on the East Coast and a

The Anatomy Of Disagreements

Epistemology, the philosophical study of human knowledge, is particularly concerned about the origin and nature of disagreements. If a single knowledge-based truth represents a rallying point for huma


bottom of page